JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 1, 1996

A- de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Valencia Asprilla Vicente·Respondent Juzgado 1 Penal Del Circuito Quibdo

✓
Topic · hard data
Nulidad Por Pretermision De Instancia.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad Por Pretermision De Instancia
  • No trámite de impugnación
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se decretó la nulidad del auto proferido por el Tribunal de la referencia que ordenó la remisión del expediente a la Corte Constitucional, lo mismo que de toda la actuación posterior, debido a que no se tramitó la impugnación, por tanto esa omisión de la segunda instancia, constituye una de las causales de nulidad del proceso.

Nulidad que es no saneable.

En consecuencia, se ordenó devolver el expediente al mencionado Tribunal para que dé el trámite correspondiente a la impugnación presentada por el actor.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DECRETASE la nulidad del auto del 6 de marzo de 1996, del Tribunal Superior de Quibdo, que ordeno la remision del expediente a la Corte Constitucional, lo mismo que de toda la actuacion posterior.
  2. Segundo. ORDENASE a la Secretaria General devolver el expediente de la referencia al Tribunal Superior de Quibdo, Sala Penal, para que se de el tramite correspondiente a la impugnacion presentada por el actor.
  3. Tercero. Surtida la segunda instancia, remitase el expediente a la Corte Constitucional para su eventual revision, tal como lo ordenan los articulos 86 de la Constitucion y 32, inciso 2o., del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.